Two frameworks, different strengths
At CodeDrips, we build with both Next.js and Gatsby regularly. They are both good tools. Choosing between them depends on what you're building.
Gatsby: the static site specialist
Gatsby generates your entire site at build time, pulling data from any source (CMS, APIs, local files) and producing optimised static HTML, CSS, and JavaScript.
Gatsby excels at
- Content-driven websites where pages don't change between builds.
- Marketing sites that prioritise performance and SEO.
- Portfolio and agency sites with structured content.
- Sites with multiple data sources, thanks to Gatsby's unified GraphQL data layer.
- Image-heavy sites, with its image processing pipeline.
Trade-offs
- Build times grow with page count.
- Dynamic, user-specific content needs workarounds.
- The GraphQL data layer has a learning curve.
Next.js: the full-stack framework
Next.js offers static generation, server-side rendering, and API routes in a single framework. More flexible, more decisions to make.
Next.js excels at
- Applications with dynamic content that changes frequently.
- User-authenticated experiences with personalised pages.
- eCommerce where inventory and pricing update in real time.
- Large-scale sites where incremental static regeneration avoids long builds.
- Full-stack applications needing API endpoints alongside the front end.
Trade-offs
- More hosting complexity (needs a Node.js server for SSR).
- More decisions about rendering strategy per page.
- Less opinionated, so more architectural choices.
How we choose
For our clients, the decision usually comes down to a few questions:
- Is the content mostly static? Gatsby's build-time approach is hard to beat for performance.
- Do you need user authentication or personalisation? Next.js handles this more naturally.
- How large is the site? Very large sites (thousands of pages) benefit from Next.js incremental regeneration.
- What's the CMS? Both work with headless CMS platforms, but Gatsby's plugin ecosystem for CMS integration is particularly mature.
The honest answer
Both frameworks produce fast, SEO-friendly websites. The technology matters less than the implementation. A well-built Gatsby site and a well-built Next.js site will both deliver great results.
What matters is having a team that understands the strengths and limitations of each and can make the right call for your specific project. Our work for Aussie SMBs has used both, depending on the project.
